In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/28/2007
at 12:50 PM, Pinnacle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>This is a call to all the XEDIT freaks that have been punking ISPF
>the last few days to put your money where your mouth is and submit
>some SHARE requirements for the ISPF editor. I get sick and tired
>of all the XEDIT freaks saying how XEDIT is way better than ISPF,
>but they never back it up with specifics.
The specifics wouldn't mean anything to you if you've never used it.
Those that have already know about such commands as SET PENDING.
>So quit B&M'ing about how ISPF sucks compared to XEDIT, and submit
>some requirements.
How do you know they haven't?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
