Tie up a PFK or command line? ==> It ties up neither. Extra infrastructure? ==> Yes, it does require an initialization process when your ISPF session is started but once you have it automated within your logon process it is invisible and painless.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Call for XEDIT freaks, submit ISPF requirements In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/28/2007 at 10:38 AM, "George, William (DHS-ITSD)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >This a very possible and quite useful via Doug Nagle's LMAC or UMAC. >I've implemented it and added many line command 'macros'. Doesn't that tie up a PFK or the command line? IAC, XEDIT support for prefix macros is *much* more extensive, and I would hope that any requirement submitted would address the extra infrastructure. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
