Howard Brazee wrote:
Privacy laws are designed to limit Big Brother, and the IS industry needs to be aware of requirements in both directions.
re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007g.html#10 Record Credit card heist...TJM recent side-track, somewhat into the privacy side of the issue http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm26.htm#42 Dilemmas of Privacy and Surveillance http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm26.htm#43 Cost of an identity for a little drift, we had been co-author of the financial privacy standard, x9.99 and i had done one of our merged glossaries and taxonomies in support of the work ... reference here http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/index.html#glosnote referencing glba, hipaa, eu-dpd, etc. in the mid-90s, the x9a10 financial standard working group had been given the requirement to preserve the integrity of the financial infrastructure for all retail payments ... the result was the x9.59 standard http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/x959.html#x959 one of the claims was that it was also privacy agnostic http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subpubkey.html#privacy in part, at the time, the EU was making some statements that they were going to require that point-of-sale electronic transactions be as anonymous as cash. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
