On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 10:29 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote:

> However, since you bring it up, let's pause for half a second and think
> about the effects Linux on System z has on z/OS.  I leave it as an exercise
> to the reader to figure out why and how, but I contend (and observe) that
> Linux is one of the best things for z/OS.  And for z/VSE, z/TPF, and z/VM.
> *Especially* for small mainframe shops.  So, should IBM-MAINers be hostile
> to Linux on z....or the opposite?

Why would there be antipathy from this august assembly ???.
Anything on z/ is fine by me - and Linux even better.
Just don't see a lot of it (here) - and what there is, is kept pretty
quiet. Very little being said publicly.

As I've said before, predominantly Windoze shops are going to stay
'doze, not migrate to Linux to move onto big iron. Just ain't happening.
Re-training all your people to Linux (and maybe z/VM as well) is just a
part of it, and we all know what's happened to training budgets.
(... tada. Steve, entering from stage left)

Shane ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to