In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/24/2007
at 11:28 AM, Rick Fochtman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Strange. ISTR using TSO under Release 18.6 of MVT. Communications
>were via TCAM.
Well, communications was via TCAM.
>Wrong, oh how wrong! The Master Scheduler was the "boss" of
>allocation and was invoked by running ANY job step, whether it was
>IEFBR14, IEFIIC, or any user-written program or any IBM or third
>party program.
The Master Scheduler was involved in processing lengthy commands,
including START. It was not involved in processing batch jobs.
>Before SVC-99, we still had SVC-34, but the setup was somewhat more
>complex and far less forgiving of errors.
The interface to SVC 34 was far simpler than that to SVC 99.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
