-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debbie Mitchell Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:20 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: VTAM question (***)
On Mon, 21 May 2007 17:11:41 +0200, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I can't say I'd ever performed this sort of research but isn't the need >to regenerate - including reassembly - customized tables one of the >sorts of issues covered by the documentation a systems programmer goes >through when planning a new release? > As it turns out, the version of ISTINCLM in use here is not IBM's default. <SNIP> You might check (if possible) to see if the userss PROFILEs were changed such that they no longer specify "MAX" for the terminal size (formerly done with =0 and the setting of the terminal types, models, etc.). I have changed my emulation to a customized emulation (MOD-9, uh, that's 132x43, or MOD4+5, your similarly described MOD9 might be 72lines by 160 chars), that is, non-standard 3270 sizes. I have also noticed the "***" when MOD2 is forced (always done just before and right after ISPF termination). But I got rid of it happening here and there under ISPF by forcing MAX for all sessions that I have (multiple IDs and multiple LPARS). Regards, Steve Thompson -- STD. Disclaimer: Poster's posting may not be in line with poster's employer. YMMV. The Three Stooges did not approve of this posting. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
