Curious. On my production system, JES2 has used about 6 times the CPU as JES2MON.
Jon <snip> >Mark Zelden wrote: >> Even in my sandbox it looks like this: >> >> NET 5278.54 >> XCFAS 2947.96 >> WLM 2565.59 >> MIA 1887.83 >> GRS 1862.82 >> MII 1800.62 >> RMFGAT 1776.38 >> *MASTER* 1235.15 >> TCPIP 945.06 >> SVOS 943.20 >> JES2MON 873.01 >> > >And, where is JES2 itself on this list? It does look silly when the >monitor uses more CPU than the monitee (is that even a word?). Monitoree? Have to add a few more... My screen was still on the same display so all the other numbers are the same. NET 5278.54 XCFAS 2947.96 WLM 2565.59 MIA 1887.83 GRS 1862.82 MII 1800.62 RMFGAT 1776.38 *MASTER* 1235.15 TCPIP 945.06 SVOS 943.20 JES2MON 873.01 OMPROUTE 833.35 ZFS 819.11 JES2 695.86 > >JES2's monitors should probably use an adaptive algorithm that gets more >aggressive when needed. JES3 monitors use very little CPU until >something appears out of the ordinary. Then they crank up. > Sounds like a good approach to me. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group: G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
