On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:47:25 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>
>- //DD(MEMBER) is supported according to the cp man page.
>
At which release? at 1.8, I see only:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:128$ uname -a
OS/390 18.00 03 2094
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:129$ man cp | grep -i dd
UNIX, the end-of-line delimiter will be added (Code page IBM-1047
in addition, it preserves file mode, owner, and group owner, if
notes" in topic SHCMDDES.CP.5 for details on how to treat text data.
topic SHCMDDES.CP.3.2.
behavior for cp" in topic SHCMDDES.CP.3.2.
tagging behavior for cp" in topic SHCMDDES.CP.3.2.
| Member/PartitionedDat| | | |
size, the record is padded with blanks.
one record. The last record is padded with blanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:130$
No mention of DDNAMEs. If I missed something, what should I have looked for?
>- UID 0 requirements for BPXBATCL "SH" option don't apply to "PGM"
>
Of course I remember an unpleasant experience with PARM='SH ...'.
But "PGM" fails to provide basic constructs such as looping, redirection,
and pipes.
I wonder why the restriction? Is it because "SH" tries to run a login
shell, and something in /etc/profile requires spawning an authorized process?
What if I try:
EXEC PGM=BPXBATSL,PARM='PGM /bin/sh -c "date | wc"'
??? I suspect that lexical limitations in BPXBATSL's parsing of its PARM
would quickly trip me up.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
