On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:46:30 +0000, Ted MacNEIL wrote: >>No manual configuration or profile changes were made. Only the hardware microcode. > >Then, I really don't understand what kind of state you're in. > >>I kind of hesitate to issue reconfiguration commands right now. >>This is our most loved LPAR. > snip! > >I have never taken the processors away from an image before CONFIGing them offline, first. >I have no idea what state the LPAR would be in, in that case. > >I would hope that PRSM & z/OS, together, would not allow it.
CUOD is a completely different situation. Hal was doing a concurrent UPGRADE. The upgrade consisted of reducing the number of processors from four to three and increasing their speed. If the concurrent upgrade had required that the LPAR with four logical processors had required that one processor be CONFIGed offline first, that would hardly have been non-disruptive, would it? I'm not surprised that it worked as it did. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
