Sorry to be a pedant - and just to make a VERY minor splash on (re)entry to the pool that is IBM-MAIN :-) ....
I feel the phrasing "to help bring the performance index into line with the goals" is a little awkward, having dimensional incompatibility built in. Something like "to help bring the performance index closer to 1" might be better. But it's still ugly. :-) Cheers, Martin Martin Packer Performance Consultant IBM United Kingdom Ltd +44-20-8832-5167 +44-7802-245-584 [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Gerhard Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Date: 24/09/2007 16:00 Subject: Re: WLC, WLM and all the rest: how optimize them ? to Steve Samson - errata corrige >If it's 'suspended' by skip clock how is managed during this period ? Is it >not serviced at all ? Does it become discretionary ? What else ? It is NOT managed, nor is it eligible to receive help regardless of what its importance level or performance index are. Keep in mind that WLM will choose a "receiver" and attempt to help bring the performance index into line with the goals. In this case, the service class being "skipped" will not be chosen as a receiver and therefore won't obtain any help. Adam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
