On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:16:06 -0500, Matthew Stitt wrote: >Several years a company I worked at saw their e-mail system get hit with a >similar (non-)attack. An executive went on vacation and set the >"out-of-office" reply to respond to "reply-all". Couple that with a few >more people out of the office, and it did not take long to bring the > Why would a MUA ever be designed to allow sending an OoO message via Reply All? (I can imagine some rationale, but it doesn't balance the risk.)
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
