RS,

CA free space is not normally irrelevant . If you are performing random 
writes it is very generally useful to have some, and CI free space is less 
useful as the overhead of a CI split is very small compared to a CA split. 
 The only time when free space is not useful is if you are only (randomly) 
adding records to the end of the file (e.g. date YYYYMMDD at the start of 
the key). I know this to be true because I have done a lot of VSAM tuning 
for customers over the last 20 years.

There is a good Redbook on VSAM which explains the whole thing in detail. 
Go have a read.

Regards.

Mike

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Poil
Java z/OS Level 3 Service
IBM United Kingdom Limited, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN
Internal: 246824  External: +44 (0)1962 816824 
Java debugging: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/diagnosis/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



"R.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU>
03/12/2007 17:02
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU>


To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: KSDS CA split, no CI split






Mike Bell wrote:
> I can think of 2 posible causes,
>  you do not have sufficient space in the INDEX component for any new 
CI's
> therefore
> 1. any new records, have to go to a new CA ie CA split
> 2. the more CA's you have (ie increase free space for the CA which means 
the
> data is loaded across more CA's) the more CA's there are to split.
> The way to fix that is to change the CI size of the index component.

I've tried with index CISZ up to 20kB. It haven't help.

Finally I eliminated CA splits by increasing CI free space (large 
values, >30%). CA free space is simply irrelevant!




> OR, you are using REPRO to add the records, which I thought always uses 
bulk
> insert logic - always do a CI split then load the records into empty CI.
Yes, I'm using REPRO. I don't think that IDCAMS always do the split.


-- 
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy 
XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, 
nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 0000025237
NIP: 526-021-50-88
Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2007 r. kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA (w 
całości opłacony) wynosi 118.064.140 zł. W związku z realizacją 
warunkowego podwyższenia kapitału zakładowego, na podstawie uchwał XVI WZ 
z dnia 21.05.2003 r., kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA może ulec 
podwyższeniu do kwoty 118.760.528 zł. Akcje w podwyższonym kapitale 
zakładowym będą w całości opłacone.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html







Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU






----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to