On Dec 19, 2007, at 12:40 PM, McKown, John wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland Schiradin
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 12:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Problem fetching a program object (CSV031I)
Michael,
what does AMBLIST tells you about "patched" module.
Why don't you use AMASPZAP for such kind of patches?
Roland
Management decision to use another platform to perform any "customized
zaps". <shudder>
I wonder if the use of the Dignus products would be indicated here. Or
perhaps instead of sending program objects, the code should be
distributed in "text decks" instead, forcing the customer to do the
linking at his end. If I remember what a friend of mine in Level 1
support once said, Top Secret used to install this way.
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology
John,
Interesting I don't recall how ACF2 did it but I have vague memories
of something similar. I do NOT know what their current method is. I
do recall that one vendor (SYNCSORT ???) put checksum statements in
to stop the finger checks that occurred with their somewhat frequent
zaps. 20 years ago I think I was getting up to 10 zaps a week from
the SYNCSORT people and it got real tiresome keying those in by hand.
I do NOT know what they do now days (anyone?).
Ed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
