In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/05/2008
at 02:21 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Do you consider the following IEBGENER step to verify the difference in
>behavior:
Yes. Did you create an ETR?
>... ? Note that the line after /./dev/null is displayed, but the line
>after /dev/null is not because according to JCL rules catenands
>following DD DUMMY are not processed.
There are *three* catenands after the DD PATH='/./dev/null'; it's
skipping the first but not the third. So not only is the behavior
described in the text inconsistent with Unix semantics, it also does not
match the behavior of the code.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
