thanks
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My latest update to Record 79232,033,000:
RESPOND ELECTRONICALLY: cp-extent
Yow!
I attempted to update this by adding a 40-line example
in C, followed by some comments. This appears to have
overstressed IBMLink: Most of my C code is missing;
the remainder is garbled, and IBM's LAST TWO UPDATES
ARE ENTIRELY MISSING. I guess that's OK because I
really wasn't very happy with what IBM had to say.
-- gil
(Summarizing, they said "WAD", of course. My comments,
which survived, were a courteous (yes!) disagreement
with WAD.)
I had thought it an advantage of IBMLink WWW that I
could so easily cut-and-paste samples, test cases,
and log excerpts. I guess I should exercise
moderation. (Unlikely?)
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
--
Kevin M. Keyes
Director of International Operations
Phoenix Software International
310-338-0400 Ext: 310
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.phoenixsoftware.com
www.vikingsoft.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
