Since this is a scratch tape, it should ignore this.  The old version of CA-1
does.  VOLSEQ 1 doesn't exist any longer either since it also was a scratch
tape.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Campbell Jay
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Problem with CA-1

Problem # 2  is  VOLSEQ=0002 

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Problem with CA-1

Hi Everyone,
We are having a problem with CA-1 which CA believes is not a CA problem.


We are trying to upgrade from v11 to v11.5.  When we implement the v11.5
we have the following problems.  The first is a problem with multiple
files on a tape.  When it complete the 4th file, we get the following
error.  The exact JCL works file on our system once we back out the new
version of CA-1.

This appears to maybe be some type of option that allows it to stack
more than 4 files on a tape, but haven't been able to track it down.
 

IEC205I TAPE,JBACKSM1,SMFD16,FILESEQ=0004, COMPLETE VOLUME LIST, 818
DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD16.G1181V00,VOLS=J00414,TOTALBLOCKS=38033
-JBACKSM1 SMFD16               00  41255   151K    .03    .03    2.7
469K   0     0     0     0     0
-JBACKSM1 B4BOMB   IEFPROC  FLUSH      0      0    .00    .00     .0
  0   0     0     0     0     0
IEC999I IFG019CA,JBACKSM1,SMFD17
IEF196I TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN REACHED TMSSMF06W END OF DSNB CHAIN
REACHED IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005,
DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00 TMSSMF30I VOL=J00414, FSEQ=0005,
DSN=JCC1.BACKUP.SMFD17.G1181V00
-JBACKSM1 SMFD17               08     58     15    .00    .00     .4
2414   0     0     0     0     0

The next problem we had was where the job called for a scratch tape, the
scratch tape was mounted (see the tape inquiry info below says it's a
scratch
tape)


M00605
 VOLSER=M00605
  VOLSER=M00605       DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO75FC.CYC8072
  EXPDT=2008/093      ACCT=HEXZEROS
  SMSMC=BLANKS        FLAG1=44=(CLO,SCR)
  HOOKID=FE=          FLAG2=40=(OUT)
CTLGCNT=000
  BATCHID=54=TMSSCR   FLAG3=00                      FLAG5=00
  USERID=TMSUSER      FLAG4=00
DSN17=UP.M147FC.CYC8072
  LJOB=MEP001CC  LDATE=2008/073   LPGM=ADRDSSU      LUNIT=057A
LTIME=0649
  CJOB=MEP001CC  CDATE=2008/073   CPGM=ADRDSSU      CUNIT=057A
CTIME=0446
  CSTEP=DUMP1    CDDNAME=TAPE01   BLKCNT=0000000000 ROBTY=00
COMPRES=078
  LABEL=SL       DEN=3590         TRTCH=256T        ROBID=000
TRERRC=00000
  RECFM=U        LRECL=000000     BLKSIZE=000000    EDMID=BLANKS
TWERRC=00000
  NUMDSNB=0000   1STDSNB=0000000  LSTDSNB=0000000   ACTVOL=
PRERRC=00000
  1STVOL=        NEXTVOL=         PREVVOL=          VOLSEQ=0002
PWERRC=00000
  COUNT=00209    VENDOR=BLANKS    BTHDATE=2007/115  VOLPERC=024
TRERRI=00000
  USECLN=00201   CLNCNT=013       DATECLN=2008/072  FILPERC=002
TWERRI=00001
  OUTCODE=BLANKS SLOT=0000000     OUTDATE=ZEROS     CPUID=JCC1
PRERRI=00000
  AUTIME=0427    AUCODE=00        AUDATE=2008/093   AUFLAG1=00
PWERRI=00000
  *** SCRATCH TAPE ***
 INQUIRY COMPLETE


Here is the error we got:

MO14FC.CYC8093
 IEC151I
A13-08,IFG0195B,MEP001CO,DUMP1,TAPE16,0570,M00605,MEP001.BACKUP.
 M102FC.CYC8093
 IEF196I TMSSMF14W VOLSEQ NOT 1 FOR FIRST FILE  TMSSMF14W VOLSEQ NOT 1
FOR FIRST FILE  IEF196I TMSSMF30I VOL=M00605, FSEQ=0001,  IEF196I
DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO00FC.CYC8093  TMSSMF30I VOL=M00605, FSEQ=0001,
DSN=MEP001.BACKUP.MO00FC.CYC8093
 -MEP001CO DUMP1                08    597    276    .00    .00    1.7


The error message says:


  08        The requested file sequence number is less than that of the
            first file on the SL or AL tape during an open to the start
of
            the file. Probable user error. Check the file sequence
number
            and volume serial numbers.

We have verified this was not a user error.  For some reason it appears
that the new CA-1 was reading the old tape label even though it was a
scratch tape.  (we do not reinit the tapes before putting them in
scratch status)


Does anyone know if we missed some options somewhere that is causing
this?
Both these problems go away when we go back to the old version.


Thanks,
Mary


Mary J. Yukus
IT Specialist - Lead Systems Programmer 
HQ US Military Entrance Processing Command                    
J6/MIT-System Support Branch

2834 Green Bay Road
North Chicago, IL  60064-3057 

Work: 847-688-3680 x7274
Work Cell: 224-627-6017  
DSN:  792-7274                
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to