On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:24:09 +0200 Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>>Not at all. There is no "SRB" to find as the SRB block only exists while >it is on a queue. Once dispatched it is simply data. :>>The registers are consistent with the point of the trap. :>I believe that I said that. My explanation wasn't really for you, it was more for those that kept telling you to look for an SSRB. Sorry. :>>Actually, CBF of the CR15 value did format it. :>And that was NOT done via summary format command *automatically*, but by actually typing in an address and provide IPCS a clue how to format it. Yes. :>>I certainly would hope that the system automatically SUMLISTs the linkage :>>stacks. :>It does, doesn't it? You were able to cbf it. Is the content inconsistent with what you hoped to see? What prompts the ongoing enquiry after Jim provided the command? It appears to be accurate. :>>Does the SLIP SL operand support indirect address off of control :>>registers? :>No clue. Your guess looking at the slip command is as good as mine. Not as of 1.8 -- Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
