I know it's bf to respond to one's own post. But, we did it with a couple of tape drives, printers and cheque processors. It was cheaper than putting a mainframe onsite. - Too busy driving to stop for gas!
-----Original Message----- From: "Ted MacNEIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 22:07:24 To:"IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <ibm-main@bama.ua.edu> Subject: Re: Remote tape drive >Several options, all -very- expensive. You need a very big pipe and one or >more humans to care for the tape unit. We did it for years with HYPERCHANNEL, and it wasn't very expensive. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
