On Mon, 26 May 2008 11:24:27 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is it possible that this worked for you because you also had >CNVTNUM=1? > As far as I'm aware, we have been using CNVTNUM=2 for the longest time: $DPCEDEF $HASP849 PCEDEF 160 $HASP849 PCEDEF CNVTNUM=2,PURGENUM=2,PSONUM=2,OUTNUM=2, $HASP849 STACNUM=2,SPINNUM=3 >And some questions: > >If CNVTNUM>1, do the multiple converters operate asynchrously, so >that even "hundreds of jcls within the one deck" could run out of >order? > >If the jobs are submitted with TYPRUN=HOLD and released later, will >they run > >o In order of release? > >o In order of conversion? > >o Other (specify)? > In our case, the jobs submitted with a TYPRUN=HOLD and then they were re- prioritized and they were always released and ran by the jobnumber in sequential order. This never posed a problem as long as they were in the same unique initiator. <snip> Best Regards, Gil. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
