You're right, the numbers do add up, they just don't add up to 45M or 400M.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 8:08 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Size Of SQA At Next IPL On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:59:04 -0400, Dave Barry wrote: > >In PARMLIB, we have SQA=(600K,45M) and CSA=(3200K,400M). After a >recent IPL, our ESQA went from 69,120K to 69,152 K. Our ECSA jumped from 409,616K to 410,608K while EPVT was reduced from 1,526,784K to 1,525,760K. > >So I lost one Meg of extended private area. The problem is getting the numbers to add up. It seems to me that the numbers add up just fine. ESQA increased by 32K. Your specification for ECSA is 409,600K and when your ESQA increased by 32K, your ECSA could not be reduced by 32K, so it was increased by 992K, for a total ECSA+ESQA increase of 1024K, or 1M That equals your 1M decrease in EPVT. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
