Makes sense, Tom. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 8:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Size Of SQA At Next IPL
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:29:26 -0400, Dave Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >You're right, the numbers do add up, they just don't add up to 45M or 400M. The I&T reference clearly says that the amount of ESQA will likely be more than you specify, and that ECSA will be rounded up so that it will end on a segment boundary. You didn't say how your common storage is being used. You had your ECSA specified at a value just a little less than what was allocated. Then all it took was a small increase in the size of your ESQA to cause the extended common to increase by 1M. -- Tom Marchant > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
