Rich Smrcina wrote:
John McKown wrote:
Thanks for the correction. But, from your comments, I would take it
that the
System z is simply not worth using, except for z/OS (maybe z/VSE) legacy
work. If this is true, then I see no reason why any company would get a z
for new work. And, if a company could move its workload from, say,
CICS to
WAS, it would be less expensive to run that work on Intel.
It makes you think that his purpose in life is to trash System z, at
least by the tone of his posts. This should not be the purpose of this
list.
The purpose of this list is to discuss about mainframes. It's not
required to present the only correct opinions.
I feel free to present my own view, despite of your opinion about me.
I consider your sentence above as simply offensive.
Last but not least: I justified my opinion with some arguments (the
numbers). Maybe you want to assess the numbers? Did I make a mistake
somewhere? Something to cheap or maybe to expensive?
BTW: I'm also considered as mainframe bigot and I don't like the opinion
as well. I'm trying to be objective and assess things without any bias.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego,
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 0000025237
NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2008 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA wynosi
118.642.672 zote i zosta w caoci wpacony.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
