On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:36:45 -0600, Arthur Gutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:35:26 -0600, Walt Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >>And by the way, we've made that processing more robust in z/OS R10 to try >>to avoid some of the problems we've seen from such incorrect parameters. >>But that won't help much until all the systems sharing a RACF database are >>at z/OS R10. > >Has IBM given thought to "making this more robust" by translating the table >into an IRROPTxx parameter member? Clear text parms (with system symbol >support?) perhaps increase the chances for a human to do it right. We've considered it, and we have requirements to do so. I can't comment on when we might implement something like that, though. -- Walt Farrell, CISSP IBM STSM, z/OS Security Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
