In
<0d91bd2a037c4943af38da4abed6c409087e6...@njpshfsexmb01.campus.corp.cendant.org>,
on 12/17/2008
at 12:27 PM, "Stocker, Herman" <[email protected]> said:
>I like it FB LRECL 80 so I can see it on terminal screen without having
>to shift right and left. We only support 80 wide displays. If I could
>get a display that would handle 255 with and still be readable I would go
>for the VB Lrecl 255.
What are you using for a display? I've been running for decades with sizes
wider than 80, my eyes are terrible and I can still read, e.g., a
132-column screen.
FWIW, I find 120 columns to be wide enough for most editing, although I've
been known to use 160 as circumstances dictated.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
