>If this is only system REXX issue, there is an example of using >AXRMLWTO in the MVS Authorized Assembler Services Guide: >http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2A881/31. 5?SHELF=IEA2BK81&DT=20080120225118
While we're at it: I once more tried to understand the advantage of using System REXX in general and especially as shown in the MCSOPER example. There is an asm routine establishing an EMCS console, then calling System REXX to issue a system command, retrieving the command response and writing it back to our previously established EMCS console, finally the assembler code, after returning from System REXX reads the command response from the EMCS console. Seems like a lot of overhead and a lot more complex than necessary to me. Why not simply issue the command directly from the asm code (using MGCRE)? What (advantage) am I missing? Is anybody using System REXX? If so, what for? -- Peter Hunkeler Credit Suisse ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
