Interesting statement. Mea culpa if I have mis-remembered or mis-read the FM's on DLL implementation. I will have to go back and re-read those FM's for my own (re)education.
But don't any DLL's dealing with "long-name" elements or interfaces need to be stored in a PDSE? Or does the "pre-link" step always resolve that issue? And does your statement also apply to C++ DLL's or only to PL/1 or COBOL DLL's? TIA for decreasing my ignorance quotient. Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Jan MOEYERSONS > Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:09 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: DLL and PDS(E) (was: Survey says...) > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:28:18 -0500, Farley, Peter x23353 > <peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote: > > >6) Cannot do that here. DLL requires PDSE, > > I don't belief that to be true... We are using DLLs (a lot) and have > stored the corresponding load modules (because in the end, that is > what it becomes at the end of the compile/pre-link/link chain) in > regular PDS as well as in PDSE. > > Makes no difference; works either way. > > Cheers, > > Jantje. This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
