On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:28:13 -0600, Tom Marchant <m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:42:29 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote: >> >>Hmmm. I'm "playing" with it now and it looks pretty good (other than I >>can't figure out how to get a 90x142 display like I'm accustomed to.) > >Wow! Thanks, Ed. I've been using 62x142 for a while. Thought that 62 >lines was all ISPF would support. I just tried 90x142 and I think I'm >hooked already. Using Vista. I tried 90... way too small. I'm sure it would be even worse when I have to work from my laptop (at work I plug into a docking station with a 17" monitor). I went down to 80 and it was readable but too "scrunched". I decreased by 2 and kept trying and the font didn't change until I hit 68. The font is slightly smaller than my 62, but still looks "proportional" as opposed to "scrunched". I could live with that, but I think working from my laptop monitor it would be hard to read. The 62 already is. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:mark.zel...@zurichna.com z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
