Damn small for this day and age. I'd bet that the complier got bigger and pushed you past some limit. I'd suggest at least 64M.
Dave Gibney Information Technology Services Washington State University > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of frederick.verw...@hrsdc-rhdsc.gc.ca > Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 10:10 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Cobol: Maximum number of FD Statements > > The region was defined by the cataloged procedure at 4096K. It didn't > change with the upgrade to z/OS. > > I agree with Dennis that it's likely a compiler issue. > > Thanks for all the ideas folks! > > > > Regards, > Eric Verwijs > Programmer Analyst | Programmeur-analyste > CPP/ OAS/ IA Production Support Team | Équipe de soutien à la > production RPC / SV / IA > frederick.verw...@hrsdc-rhdsc.gc.ca > Telephone | Téléphone 613-941-7492 > Facsimile | Télécopieur 613-941-4234 > National Headquarters | Administration Centrale > Human Resources and Skills Development Canada | Ressources humaines et > Développement des compétences Canada > Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Gibney, Dave > Sent: 2009-03-02 12:52 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Cobol: Maximum number of FD Statements > > What's the REGION on the Compile step? Also check the SIZE options. > > Dave Gibney > Information Technology Services > Washington State University > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > > Behalf Of Roach, Dennis (N-GHG) > > Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 9:41 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > > Subject: Re: Cobol: Maximum number of FD Statements > > > > Sounds more like a compiler problem than a compile problem. It could > > be a table overflow or anything. IBM, or the owner of the compiler, > > should be contacted. I doubt that this group will be of much help. > > > > Dennis Roach > > GHG Corporation > > Lockheed Martin Mission Services > > Flight Design and Operations Contract > > Address: > > 2100 Space Park Drive > > LM-15-4BH > > Houston, Texas 77058 > > Mail: > > P.O. Box 58487 > > Mail Code H4C > > Houston, Texas 77258 > > Phone: > > Voice: (281)336-5027 > > Cell: (713)591-1059 > > Fax: (281)336-5410 > > E-Mail: dennis.ro...@lmco.com > > > > All opinions expressed by me are mine and may not agree with my > > employer or any person, company, or thing, living or dead, on or near > > this or any other planet, moon, asteroid, or other spatial object, > > natural or manufactured, since the beginning of time. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] > On > > > Behalf Of frederick.verw...@hrsdc-rhdsc.gc.ca > > > Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 6:56 AM > > > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > > > Subject: Re: Cobol: Maximum number of FD Statements > > > > > > No error. > > > > > > We just upgraded to z/OS 1.8 and one of the programs that compiled > > > before the upgrade no longer compiled after it. It was just a shot > > > in the dark to figure out why it wasn't compiling since it has an > > > awful lot of reports. > > > > > > An even more irritating thing is that a previous version of the > > > offending program still compiles and all the programmer did in the > > new > > > version (afaik) is add a bunch of new reports. > > > > > > It's a strange compile error too, S0C1 and and doesn't even point > to > > a > > > statement in the program. No real compile listing either. > > > > > > We use CA Workbench to do compiles (I usually just grab the JCL and > > > don't bother with CAWB) and we think something wasn't done right > > > with it. It's a strange error. > > > > > > CEE3201S The system detected an operation exception (System > > Completion > > > Code=0C1). > > > From compile unit CXPHSSQ at entry point CXPHSSQ. > > > <> LEAID ENTERED (LEVEL 10/15/2007 AT 09.21) <> LEAID PROCESSING > > > COMPLETE. RC=4 > > > > > > If people are REALLY curious, I can supply more information. > > > > > > I successfully did a compile using a different compiler (CWPCMAIN). > > The > > > S0C1 occurs with IGYCRCTL. Perhaps we're using wrong Compiler > > options. > > > I don't know. > > > > > > Our support staff are looking at this and one of them may even read > > > this list. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Eric Verwijs > > > Programmer Analyst | Programmeur-analyste CPP/ OAS/ IA Production > > > Support Team | Équipe de soutien à la production RPC / SV / IA > > > frederick.verw...@hrsdc-rhdsc.gc.ca > > > Telephone | Téléphone 613-941-7492 > > > Facsimile | Télécopieur 613-941-4234 National Headquarters | > > > Administration Centrale Human Resources and Skills Development > > > Canada | Ressources humaines > > et > > > Développement des compétences Canada Government of Canada | > > > Gouvernement du Canada > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] > On > > > Behalf Of Lizette Koehler > > > Sent: 2009-02-27 3:00 PM > > > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > > > Subject: Re: Cobol: Maximum number of FD Statements > > > > > > So what error are you getting that leads to this question? > > > > > > Lizette > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hello everybody, > > > > > > > >Our installation is running z/OS 1.8, IBM Enterprise COBOL for > z/OS > > > 3.4.1. If I'm missing something here, let me know. > > > > > > > >I've looked in our Cobol language reference and the programming > > guide > > > and of course, searched the web. If the answer's there, I've not > > found > > > it. > > > > > > > >How many FD/SD statements can a Cobol program have? According to > my > > > System 390 JCL manual, a job step can have 3273 DD statements. So, > I > > > expect a Cobol program could not have more than that. > > > > > > > >Perhaps there is no defined maximum other than the maximum Cobol > > > program size, whatever that is. Can anybody tell me? > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > > - > > - > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send > > > email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > > - > > - > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send > > > email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN > > INFO > > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
