On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:09:48 -0500, Field, Alan C. wrote: > >I've asked our developers to investigate what we can do to clear up >this problem with the cancelled PTF that is co-req'd by the PTFs in >SDM and DSS. HSM PTF's UA46642 UA46641 UA46640 were created and now >closed COR, and these supercede the cancelled PTFs. So if you pull >these you should be able to get the maintenance on. It appears the >problem is that the SDM and DSS PTFs call for the cancelled HSM PTF >instead of its superceding PTF. > ???
It has long been my understanding that a SUPerseding sysmod unconditionally satisfies any requirement for the superseded sysmod. Is it a structural problem in that there's no HOLDDATA to cause GROUPEXTEND to work? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
