Pat, Do you remember if you had to convert all the APPLIDs to use APPC=YES? It appears when we knocked down the Cross Domains and attempt using APPN; VTAM is searching through ISTAPNCP first then the Cross Domain definitions for the APPLIDs. Since we didn't define anything in ISTAPNCP it can't locate the APPLID. We're not exactly sure if definitions are dynamically built in ISTAPNCP or whether we have to manually define them. Any help in pointing us in the right direction would be appreciated.
P.S. Mark Yuhas says HI! Regards, John Au -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 12:30 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: CL/Supersession and APPN On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:23:52 -0700, John Au <john...@paccar.com> wrote: >... he was able to get APPN working, but >now he is struggling with CL/Supersession. Any help you can provide >would be most appreciated. >... I haven't been in a shop with Supersession for over 5 years but I had no trouble getting it to work over APPN connections in my previous shop, and we have TPX (another session manager) working over APPN at my current shop. Do you have other "cross domain" sessions working over APPN? I can think of no reason there would be a problem with only Supersession. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html