Um, you would run a mass change utility against your production database not 
knowing exactly what it would do? 

Testing against a copy sounds like a pretty good idea to me. 

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Pinnacle
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 3:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DFRMM - CATSYNCH

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hale, Bob" <bob.h...@roundys.com>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 3:38 PM
Subject: DFRMM - CATSYNCH

 
>
..snip 

Bob,

Why would you want to do this?  Running CATSYNCH against a copy of the CDS 
doesn't make sense.  What am I missing here?

Regards,
Tom Conley 

 
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, 
together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information.
Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
distribution 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to