I prefer the PARMLIB method, but use the assembled module as a backup. With the PARMLIB method, displaying options is easier and making dynamic changes is easier. Also, as you pointed out, it allows you to have different options on different systems that share the LE libraries.
Don Imbriale -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 5:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: LE options There appears to be (at least) two ways to change LE runtime options system wide. There's the assember macro table way (CEEDOPT for batch and CEECOPT for CICS) and there's the PARMLIB(CEEPRM00) way. Is one preferred over the other? Does one offer something the other does not? I am thinking that the PARMLIB way allows for multiple systems to share the same LE libraries and still have different LE options, if desired. Is this the reason for is its existence? If we use the PARMLIB way is there anything that has to be done with the macros and can't be done with the PARMLIB? Honestly, there are so many ways to change LE options that it's hard to keep them all straight! Thanks, This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
