Scott,
Don't you have to define the desired input and output first before
you select the methodology to do the "deed" ?
Ed
On Jun 24, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
There are a lot of ways to crack this nut, rexx,perl, various clist
languages
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Jun 24, 2012, at 11:36 AM, John McKown <joa...@swbell.net> wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 22:19 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In
<a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea0115baa1...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom>,
on 06/22/2012
at 12:00 PM, "McKown, John" <john.mck...@healthmarkets.com> said:
On z/OS you can use awk or Perl!
Why not REXX?
Note; while I admit that in recent years I have written more Perl
code
than REXX, I still consider REXX to be a cleaner language.
Hum, I guess because I was thinking of alternatives to REXX to do
arithmetic. I do a lot of CGI's in REXX, in order to do ADDRESS
TSO to
issue RACF and other TSO commands.
--
John McKown
Maranatha! <><
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-
MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
