On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:51:41 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > >The resistance to the global SIGTERM suggestion was probably due to >unintended side effects. If you want a SIGTERM generated on shutdown, >it should only go to those dubbed applications that have registered >for it. Such a registration service belongs in a suggestion rather >than in the statement of requirements, although it might be reasonable >to submit a separate requirement for it. > As I stated initially, one of my motives was portability. In a conventional UNIX system, processes needn't register to receive SIGTERM. Likewise, it should be unnecessary in z/OS UNIX (USS).
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
