It is possible, according to: http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2g490/3.2.2 <quote> Note: Global resource serialization ring complexes can contain XCFLOCAL, MONOPLEX, or systems that are part of a multisystem sysplex. However, only one multisystem sysplex can exist in any global resource serialization complex. </quote>
-- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Staller, Allan > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 9:00 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Remove a system from a SYSPLEX but keep it in the GRS ring > > AFAIK, this will not work. Proceed at your own risk. The issue is GRS > communication between the XCFLOCAL (or MONOPLEX) and SYSPLEX. > > If you have MIA/MIM from CA, this (again AFAIK) will allow what you > have described. > <snip/> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
