I won't do that.   It's a double edged sword.   I've had my management tell me 
to make something a SEV1, I *think* mostly because it's important to them, or 
maybe impatience.

My stock answer is always, if it's a SEV1, I have to do anything to resolve it, 
up to and including disrupting the system further.

A true SEV1 in my book is something of a crippling nature, that you work around 
the clock on until fixed or a workaround is in place, at which time, the 
problem is no longer a SEV1.   If I expect my vendors to work around the clock, 
then I better be prepared to as well, otherwise it is not a SEV1.   Making it a 
SEV1 just to get priority response is bad form, and tends to get ignored in the 
future by the same vendors.

_________________________________________________________________
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering
[email protected]
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MIĀ  49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717



This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to