On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:09:07 -0500, Don Williams <donb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I don't know if they still exist, but there use to be applications that did >BLDLs of linklist modules. Refreshing LLA was moot. LLA is still in play here and beneficial. > Compressing those >libraries could be hazardous to those applications. It still is if you don't remove it from LLA first. >Then there was the co-worker > who liked to stage changes in linklist and not do the LLA refresh until > implelemtation time. aghhh... Exactly what I was referring to when I said it could be dangerous to do an LLA REFRESH. This is a common "strategy" for some people or shops to change a module or modules and not do the LLA UPDATE until a specific time. > Dynamically adding or deleting libraries was > not possible back then. > To LNKLST - yes. But you were able to add / remove libraries from LLA. Don't confuse LNKLST with LLA. Regards, Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:m...@mzelden.com Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
