Hi Arthur,
I am aware of CBT 106. I presented my solution in case the user wanted
to know if s/he had access.
If so, s/he could avoid all of the paperwork and permission required to
change IKJTSOxx etc. (which is probably almost never granted).
I had a job at a large bank and asked for IKJTSOxx to be changed, so
that DFSMSdss could be invoked via Rexx/CLIST (interactively).
To make a long story short, the head MVS guy refused.
It seems as if some people are not aware of some of the theoretical
aspects of Address Spaces and how each Address Space's Virtual Private
Storage is actually private.
Regards,
David
On 2020-06-14 00:31, Arthur wrote:
On 13 Jun 2020 21:22:07 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<by5pr07mb71867b89d54a923b47165da4a6...@by5pr07mb7186.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>)
dspiegel...@hotmail.com (David Spiegel) wrote:
Here is my solution ...
1) An Assembler program ... Does not to be APF Authorized, if ESM is
RACF. (If ESM is ACF/2 or TSS, it needs APF Authorization).
Your program asks "Do I have access?" CBT file 106 needs to run
authorized because it asks, "Does this *other* user have access?" The
OPs question could be interpreted either way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
