Ditto, sorry to go "off-topic" again ... I hope IBM is reading this, and hope they look to adding WireGuard support on Z. >From what little I know, WireGuard is far more manageable and performant than >IPSec & IKEv2. Adding WireGuard support to z/OS shouldn't be too much of a "deviation" too, considering that the Linux kernel and OpenBSD now come baked-in with WG.
Link - https://www.wireguard.com/ - KB ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Thursday, July 2, 2020 4:11 AM, Grant Taylor <0000023065957af1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On 7/1/20 1:49 PM, Crawford, Robert C. wrote: > > > We're considering using IPSEC to secure traffic between an internal > > router and a CICS application. Can anyone on this list give us any > > hints, tips or gotchas they may have from doing something similar > > themselves. > > I can't help. > > But I'd love to be a fly on the wall and learn. > > I've also got some questions, but that's more active than fly on the wall. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Grant. . . . > unix || die > > ------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
