> What happens to email if CSSMTP (AT-TLS) is configured to *require*
> encryption and the receiving system doesn't support encryption?

Are you assuming direct-to-MX? Are you assuming using a mail server not under 
the control of the z/OS system's management. If not, then I've already 
addressed the issue.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Grant Taylor [0000023065957af1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 11:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sending email from the Mainframe

On 7/23/20 1:24 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> But what, someone may ask, if the realy connects to a box that doesn't
> support TLS 1.2? The same thing as if the traffic from CSSMTP were
> unencrypted, and not the concern of the z/OS staff unless the relay
> is also running on z/OS.

What happens to email if CSSMTP (AT-TLS) is configured to *require*
encryption and the receiving system doesn't support encryption?

I presume that CSSMTP will fail to send the email b/c of the lack of
encryption.

What happens to these unsent emails?

Does an error get sent back to the sending application?

Do the unsent messages pile up in a spool somewhere?

Even at ~90% support for encryption, that's one in ten emails that can't
be sent via encrypted channels.  What happens to that 10% that can't be
sent with encryption?  Also, I don't believe the ~90% figure.  I believe
it to be somewhere between 60% and 70% and that there is a geographic
influence to the number.

I agree that requiring encryption is perfectly reasonable.  I think that
requiring TLS 1.2 is a laudable goal.

But I also think it would be negligent to fail to have a plan for email
that can't be sent via encrypted channels.

What happens to the email that CSSMTP (AT-TLS) wants to send if the
receiving system has an expired certificate and thus fails validation?
This is a fairly common short lived oops.

Also, I was not questioning the merit of TLS.  I was simply inquiring if
the requirement was for encryption, which can be accomplished multiple
ways, or if it was for TLS specifically.



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to