it was superseded by UJ02346 in PUT2003 which was contained in RSU2006. so I would imagine that if it was already supped just 2 months later that getting it now would probably not be a productive use of your time.
While you can install by PUT, I would not. I think it's far better to stick with RSU's. Less work (for me) and less problems. Unless you actually really and truly need one (or more) of the non-RSU (yet) fixes, I would not order them them, or at least not install them. There is too much chance of (eventual) error before the RSU testing is complete. Brian On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:24:27 -0500, R Hey <sys...@yahoo.com> wrote: >Thanks for the replies. > >I ordered UJ01255, it had PUT2001 (no RSUnnnn 8 months later). > >I did raise the issue with support, was told : > > UJ01255 was not included in RSU2001. > It didn't not meet the following criteria: > -Severity 1 or 2 > -HIPER > -PEFIX > -Security/integrity > -Special Attention > -Pervasiveness > >I've read/heard that one should order RECOMMENDED, then apply srcid(RSUnnnn). >I did an ORDER-ALL today for zos 2.3 & got 490 PTFs more than I got 2 weeks >ago for RECOMENDED. >20 of them has RSU2008, 391 had PUTnnnn. > >So if I apply RSU**, I'll miss 391+ PTFs. > >How do you guys do apply, srcid(PUTnnnn)? > >Thanks, >Rez > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
