I also use manual modification and it works fine. NCA in the other hand seems daunting to me. A question and answer format like zCX would be far better IMHO.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 7:05 AM Roberto Halais <roberto.hal...@gmail.com> wrote: > We are using manual modifications. Before, we used the Windows application > which was excellent. > We tried z/OSMF NCA but don't like it. > Maybe IBM will force us to use it. > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:21 PM Keith Gooding < > 0000034af3894af4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > Is anyone using this to maintain AT-TLS policies or any other policies ? > > > > Any views on NCA vs manual editing of the policy file ? > > > > When I first encountered AT-TLS I used the Windows version to generate a > > simple policy file for one type of application and thereafter did manual > > edits to the policy file (all applications were similar). Using AT-TLS > for > > z/OS-supplied applications such as Telnet and FTP will make the policy > file > > more complicated and I am wondering whether NCA is the best way. > > > > Keith > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > -- > Politics: Poli (many) - tics (blood sucking parasites) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Michael Babcock OneMain Financial z/OS Systems Programmer, Lead ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
