I downloaded the new documentation, and address doesn't seem to have the same semantics as in REXX.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of René Jansen [rene.vincent.jan...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 9, 2022 3:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Ad NetRexx (Re: Ad programming features (Re: ... Re: Top 8 Reasons for using Python instead of REXX for z/OS Hi Shmuel. NetRexx has ADDRESS. It was added by Marc Remes in release 4.01. It can address any executable on your system. Subsequent versions will add ADDRESS WITH for collections and network. This was a syntactical addition, the runtime contains, for years and years already, the package org.netrexx.address, which has class OSProcess with method exec(), outtrap(command=Rexx) (where could that have come from?) and event for lines of output. But we decided to make this look more like Rexx. Best regards, René. > On 9 Jan 2022, at 11:29, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: > > FSVO follows. NetRexx doesn't have the concept of routing bare expressions to > the default environment. In fact, it doesn't have the address statement at > all, unless there has been a subsequent addition to the language. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
