"David Crayford" <dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/2/22 8:29 pm, Seymour J Metz wrote: > > I couldn't imagine voluntarily using an editor that didn't have a > > good macro language. The ubiquity of vi is certainly a good reason > > to learn it, but not to use it routinely. > > Huh? I use nvim (neovim) which has the full force of Lua for writing > plugins, and that includes customizing the UI. I can't even write a > custom syntax highlighter for ISPF! > > I take it you don't know much about Vim?
I'll second the vote for Vim (I use Gvim most of the time). Powerful and simple. <obEditorWar> Much better than emacs </obEditorWar> Eric Rossman, CISSP® ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
