On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:49:38 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote: >Sorry for reaching back to an older posting in this thread. I did not see >this question handled. I worked with Ed at that same institution, the late >great Security Pacific Bank. While it's true that (undoubtedly) no module >in the widely shared production load library was marked AC(1), the library >itself was APF authorized because some modules were called out of CPCS, >IBM's check processing product that itself ran authorized. > >So the question: if a program is running in an APF environment but is not >itself marked AC(1), do the PARMDD considerations apply? > If it's called out of a program rather than from JCL, PARMDD should be irrelevant.
Do you believe that CPCS passes arguments longer than 100 bytes? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
