Shmuel wrote: >I would argue that multiple edits that are part of a single enhancement belong in a single checkin. For context, this is based on using a home grown IDE that timestamped changed lines, solicited and formatted change descriptions, and generally did the grunt work to have a good audit trail.
Oh, absolutely. I meant that without the AUX file forcing you to enter a description, I see people making multiple enhancements in a single checkin with SVN, git, et al. Of course you're supposed to enter a description at checkin, but that's after the fact. "Naming" it before you start seems to remind folks "You're fixing x" and when that's done, they add a new line for y and then one for z. Or maybe this is just me imagining rigor where there really isn't any. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
