Thanks. The customer is reporting 1's, 2's and 3's, so there must be some program logic confusion.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Dave Jousma Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 9:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:32:53 -0700, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: >We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having >trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I. > >The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the >SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as >Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the >x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of >binary 1, 2 or 3. > >Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0" >IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth? > /* 10000000 = 80 = AUDIT ON */ /* 10010000 = 90 = CHANGE KEY */ /* 10100000 = A0 = CADS USAGE */ /* 10110000 = B0 = CADS+CHANGE KEY */ /* 11000000 = C0 = CSA USAGE */ /* 11010000 = D0 = CSA+CHANGE KEY */ /* 11100000 = E0 = CSA+CADS */ /* 11110000 = F0 = CSA+CADS+CHANGEKEY */ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN