MXG decodes these raxflags:
SMF30_RAXFLAGS='AUDIT*USERKEY*CSA*FLAGS'
SMF30_RAXFLAG0='RAX0*USERKEY*COMMON*AUDIT*ENABLED?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG1='RAX1*USERKEY*COMMON*AUDIT*USAGE?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG2='RAX2*USERKEY*CADS*USAGE?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG3='RAX3*USERKEY*CHANGE*KEY*USAGE?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG4='RAX4*USERKEY*RUCSA*USAGE?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG5='RAX5*ATTEMPT*EARLY*RUCSA?'
SMF30_RAXFLAG6='RAX6*ALLOW*EARLY*RUCSA?'
IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='1.......'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG0='Y';
ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG0=' ';
IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='.1......'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG1='Y';
ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG1=' ';
IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='..1.....'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG2='Y';
ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG2=' ';
IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='...1....'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG3='Y';
ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG3=' ';
IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='....1...'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG4='Y';
ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG4=' ';
IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='.....1..'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG5='Y';
ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG5=' ';
IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='......1.'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG6='Y';
ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG6=' ';
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 11:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX).
So is my interpretation correct?
SMF30_USERKEYCSAUSAGE is x'02'?
Charles
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 8:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having
trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I.
The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the
SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as
Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the
x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of
binary 1, 2 or 3.
Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0"
IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
