Run your silly Rexx under UNIX. Ir's simpler. On Mon, 30 May 2022 15:52:24 +0300, Itschak Mugzach wrote: > >A rexx exec is processing a file system. First call to bpxbatch perform ls >looping on the directories listed in the root to look for specific files > <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=descriptions-find-find-file-that-meets-specified-criteria> (Note "-exec".)
<https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=descriptions-readdir> >(ignore the logix, it was dictated by a uniprocessor and a mixture of >software). >I noticed that every call to unix creates (or starts) a shadow STC to >process the command. My assumption is that the way it works affects elapse, >and maybe, cpu consumption. I want the program to be as efficient as >possible. > >so, to summarize: > > - The Program is a (tso) rexx running unix commands. > - Using the default shell of the user. > Bad idea. Unpredictable and hard to test. > - I want to eliminate the STC, or keep it for the life of the exec. > - The quoted statement relates to the fact that I assume it is less > effective to run unix outside of the address space. > This feels like asking that all steps of a batch job use the same TCB. >On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 3:41 PM Kirk Wolf wrote: >> ... >> - Why exactly do you want BPXBATCH? >> Perhaps he doesn't have COZBATCH. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
