On 20/06/2022 5:47 am, Joe Monk wrote:
"Please elaborate how IMS TM is anything more than a message queue that
processes transactions."
Youre quibbling about form over substance.
I'm asking you to back up your statement.
As an example, NASA uses message queue processing for spacecraft telemetry.
NASA doesn't use IMS.
Joe
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 4:39 PM David Crayford <dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20/06/2022 5:27 am, Joe Monk wrote:
"What have transactional systems like CICS or IMS got to do with
real-time, straight-through processing? Most mainframe transactions
store data that is later processed by batch, typically overnight."
If you think CICS and IMS are transactional only, youre stuck in the
'80s.
I've spent the last 20+ years working on ISV products for IMS and CICS.
Please elaborate how IMS TM is anything more than a message queue that
processes
transactions. If you want to throw IMS Connect into the mix then please
comment as I have in depth knowledge of the architecture as I was on dev
on the
IMS Connect Extensions product.
As an example, ICCF on VSE uses CICS as the TP Monitor. Tell me that
writing code, storing it in a library, compiling, etc. are not
"real-time".
Awesome :/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
